Kevin Nadal, a professor of psychology at John Jay College of Criminal Justice, has spent years researching and writing books on the effects of microaggressions. Nadal (2020) states, “You do not have to be of a certain group to understand something is unjust. It is really about learning how to be empathetic to people. Moreover, to be aware and knowledgeable of history. This country is founded on racism toward Indigenous people and racism toward Black people, and that’s not new” (Limbong, 2020). Nadal reports that people of color are often asked to educate White people on issues that they person of color has lived with and thought about for their entire lives (Limbong, 2020). That can be psychologically and emotionally exhausting for a person to care about the White person’s feelings and make those extra efforts so that they can learn something that they should have and could have learned throughout their life. Nadal suggests that people with privileged identities who want to be true allies should initiate doing their work. People with privileged identities should accept that it is their job and responsibility to engage in uncomfortable conversations and emotions. In doing so, people of color, women, or LGBTQ folks will not have to have those conversations for you (Limbong, 2020). Are microaggressions a result of aggression? Could microaggressions constitute a form of aggression? If we conceptualize microaggressions as isolated, unintended individual events, it seems counterintuitive that they represent hostility or aggression. Microaggressions represent a behavior pattern reinforcing a social hierarchy whereby outgroup members are cast in a subordinate position (Williams, 2020b). Those who experience microaggressions would be wise to recognize these signals of danger being emitted by offenders and exercise caution (Williams, 2020b) because if microaggressions reflect hostile and aggressive tendencies, it may be socially dangerous for victims to confront offenders. Microaggressions have been associated with mental health outcomes. Research has indicated that racial microaggressions are associated with increased mental health symptoms among Blacks. Recent reveals that microaggressions were associated with increased endorsement of PTSD symptoms. Distress associated with invisibility microaggressions was also associated with increased PTSD symptoms above and beyond microaggression frequency (Abdullah et al., 2021). Thus, not only are microaggressions disturbing to those that are victims, these experiences with microaggressions may contribute to trauma for these victims. Microaggressions also pose a barrier to mental health care when committed by mental health providers and have been implicated as a cause of mental health disparities. The types of prejudice and perceived stigma associated with microaggressions have also been found to impact minorities adversely and correlate with mental health problems (Cruz et al., 2019). Cruz et al. (2019) wanted to examine if patient perceptions of racial microaggressions during visits with healthcare providers would positively correlate with psychological distress. They found that participants felt their doctors held negative stereotypes about their racial/ cultural groups. Participants in the study also reported that physicians were culturally insensitive and avoided addressing diversity in their medical encounters. These findings suggest that people of color are highly attuned to the racial/cultural contexts in their interactions with healthcare providers, likely because of past experiences with racism as a chronic stressor that is not limited to isolated
interactions (Cruz et al., 2019). They also found that racial microaggressions correlated with depression and anxiety as psychological stress (Cruet et al. al, 2019). An interesting finding of this research was that participants who reported some college exposure reported higher levels of perceived healthcare microaggressions than participants who completed either high school or college (Cruz et al., 2019). Evidence-Based Practice: Data shows that a greater frequency of racial microaggressions was significantly associated with greater traumatic stress symptoms, and that school or workplace microaggressions were the type of microaggression that was most associated with traumatic symptoms. Note : From “Challenging definitions of psychological trauma: Connecting racial microaggressions and traumatic stress,” by Nadal, K. L., et al., 2019. Journal for Social Action in Counseling & Psychology, 11(2), 2-16. A variety of microaggressions can interfere with establishing a respectful partnership. When counselors are members of the dominant culture, they are not immune to engaging in microaggressions, defined as brief, everyday unconscious or conscious exchanges that convey denigrating messages to people because they belong to an oppressed group or groups (Nadal, Erazo, & King, 2019; Davis et al., 2016; Sue et al., 2007). There are various microaggressions, including ● Microassault: A verbal or nonverbal attack intended to hurt another, such as name calling or visually ignoring a person. ● Microinsult: Rude or insensitive communication demeaning the person’s heritage, implying that people of color were chosen for a position only because of their minority status. ● Microinvalidation: Excluding or negating the individual’s thoughts, feelings, or experiences, such as telling a person with a disability that she is being too sensitive to her perception that attitudes toward individuals with disability affected a particular interaction (Sue et al., 2007). Microassaults can also appear as jokes that mock or degrade a racial/ethnic group, a disability, or a gender identity. Typically, the person telling the joke will respond with “I was only joking.” Nevertheless, their bias is manifested in their comments/jokes, which perpetuate harmful stereotypes. Microinsults can look like assuming that someone is not smart based on their appearance or implying that certain groups of people do not have morals. They might even be used to suggest that someone does not belong. This includes assuming that someone will not understand a new process at work because English is not their first language or saying that someone is not from a marginalized group because they do not act stereotypically. Microinvalidation occurs when someone attempts to discredit or minimize the experiences of a person from an underrepresented group. For instance, if a Muslim American coworker is sharing a time when they felt disrespected and you interrupt to say they were not discriminated against or start talking about your own experiences to contradict what was shared, it is an example of microinvalidation. Microinsults and microinvalidations generally fall outside of the perpetrator’s conscious awareness. Recent research has suggested that microaggressions interfere with the counseling relationship (Davis et al., 2016; Branco & Bayne, 2020). Therefore, counselors must be aware of what microaggressions are and actively reflect on their attitudes and behaviors within and outside the counseling session.
Page 29
Book Code: PYTX1226
EliteLearning.com/Psychology
Powered by FlippingBook