Does the patient have a suicide plan? If a specific plan is described, the clinician should document that and document whether the patient has self-injurious or lethal plans. Additionally, the clinician should inquire about the method of suicide rehearsals, such as loading a gun, walking on a bridge to assess the height, or tying a noose. Whenever possible, the clinician should confirm findings with a family member or a close friend because patients are more likely to inform close relations of suicidal ideation than they are to tell a healthcare provider. 4. Assessment of protective factors : The clinician should inquire about existing protective factors against suicidal thoughts, such as strong family ties and friendships or the presence of a significant other. Additionally, religious belief, faith, and a sense of belonging can be used as protective factors. It is best to explore the patient’s reasons to die versus reasons to live. The presence of protective factors can help dampen the suicide risk in people with low or moderate suicide risks. Ideally, protective factors can be strengthened and used as part of safety planning in patients with low to moderate suicide risks. 5. Clinical judgment : The provider should use the above information to form and make a clinical decision on the risk of suicide. Clinical decision making is complex given the medical comorbidities, mental health diagnoses, and the contextual and environmental factors affecting patients with suicidal risk. This decision-making process also includes appropriate documentation of risk and intervention. recently updated by Chu and colleagues (2015). The Joiner assessment model is comprehensive and organized into four risk categories (low, moderate, severe, extreme). However, these categories are flexible, and individuals can be classified in between categories (e.g., low-moderate, moderate-severe). As with all risk assessments, Joiner and colleagues note “suicide risk categories guide clinical decision making and allow clinicians to titrate the level of clinical action insofar that efficiency and efficacy are maximized” (Chu et al., 2015, p. 1187). The first step involves conducting the suicide risk assessment. Joiner and colleagues provide a template for a semi-structured interview to use (see the article by Chu and colleagues in the Resources section of this course). Box 1 is a sample semi-structured interview for clinicians to conduct when assessing suicide risk. The Joiner system
Assessment of risk level is based on clinical judgment after completing steps 1 through 3. High risk level: ● Risk and/or protective factors: Psychiatric disorders with severe symptoms, or acute precipitating event. ● Suicidality : Potentially lethal suicide attempt or persistent ideation with strong intent or rehearsal. ● Possible interventions : Admission generally indicated unless a significant change reduces risk; suicide precautions necessary. Moderate risk level: ● Risk and/or protective factors : Multiple risk factors, few protective factors. ● Suicidality : Suicidal ideation with plan, but no intent or behavior. ● Possible interventions : Admission may be necessary depending on risk factors. Develop crisis plan. Give emergency/crisis numbers. Low risk level : ● Risk and/or protective factors : Modifiable risk factors, strong protective factors. ● Suicidality : Thoughts of death but no plan, intent, or behavior ● Possible interventions : Outpatient referral, symptom reduction, give emergency/crisis numbers. The documentation of the above-four components in their entirety within the medical record (Kazim, 2017). requires the assignment of a risk category that then guides the clinician’s intervention. After risk is assessed, clinicians can use the suicide decision-tree to determine risk level (see Figure 1 and Table 3). For example, a person who has not attempted suicide multiple times experiencing suicidal ideation with limited intensity and duration, with no intent, would be assigned a low-risk category; a person who has attempted death by suicide multiple times with strong intent and who has made preparations for suicidal behavior would be assigned to the extreme-risk category. Joiner and colleagues also offer clinicians possible actions to take depending on the client’s risk category and explain how to appropriately document these actions (see Box 2). Some of the actions listed in Box 2 are explained in greater detail later in the course.
SUICIDE ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK OPTION #2: JOINER ASSESSMENT MODEL Joiner and colleagues (1999) originally developed a suicide risk assessment decision-tree interview based on the interpersonal theory of suicide, which was also
Page 79
Book Code: SWUS1525
EliteLearning.com/Social-Work
Powered by FlippingBook