____________________________________________ Professional Ethics and Law in California, 2nd Edition
25. Which of the following statements accurately outlines the requirements for obtaining a professional clinical counselor license (LPCC) according to the California Board of Behavioral Sciences? A) LPCC licenses are automatically granted to anyone with a master’s or doctoral degree, regardless of their supervised experience or examination results. B) An applicant must have a master’s or doctoral degree, complete 2,000 hours of supervised experience, and achieve a passing score on any designated examinations. C) To obtain an LPCC license, one must meet criteria including a master’s or doctoral degree, 3,000 hours of supervised experience, and a passing score on specified examinations. D) LPCC licenses are granted solely based on the successful completion of coursework related to professional clinical counseling, without any examination or supervised experience requirements. 26. Which of the following best distinguishes between different forms of emotional responses related to perceived ethical violations, as described in the provided text? A) Observable justifiable anger and ungrounded moral rage are two interchangeable terms describing the same emotional reaction to ethical violations. B) Moral outrage and principled moral outrage both refer to impulsive emotional responses without consideration of ethical principles. C) Ungrounded moral rage and principled moral outrage represent opposite ends of the emotional spectrum in response to ethical issues. D) Observable justifiable anger, ungrounded moral rage, and principled moral outrage represent distinct emotional responses, with the latter involving empathy, compassion, and ethical decision-making. 27. What characterizes an ethical dilemma in a professional context? A) A situation where multiple principles in a code of ethics always align perfectly, leaving a clear best course of action. B) An instance in which there are no ethical principles to guide decision-making. C) A scenario where at least two options exist, each with advantages and disadvantages, making it challenging to determine the best course of action. D) A circumstance where professional codes of ethics are not applicable.
28. How can one effectively address ethical dilemmas in a professional setting? A) By ignoring professional obligations and standards of care. B) By always giving priority to a single ethical principle. C) By identifying which principles apply, how they conflict, and which ones take precedence in a given situation. D) By exclusively relying on virtue ethics to guide decision- making. 29. What role do consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics play in working through ethical dilemmas in a professional context? A) They have no relevance in addressing ethical dilemmas. B) They provide rigid and inflexible frameworks for resolving ethical dilemmas. C) They offer alternative ethical perspectives that can be helpful in navigating complex ethical situations. D) They serve as the sole basis for professional codes of ethics. 30. What is a mental health practitioner’s responsibility when it comes to supporting a client’s self- determination, as described in the provided text? A) Mental health practitioners should always prioritize their own values and opinions over the client’s choices to ensure safety. B) Mental health practitioners are obligated to assist clients in achieving their goals unless the client’s choices clearly endanger themselves or others. C) Mental health practitioners must impose their own values on clients when faced with challenging decisions, such as abusive relationships. D) Mental health practitioners should never deviate from their personal values and beliefs, even if it means overriding the client’s choices. 31. Which ethical principle is closely related to the concept of autonomy and self-determination in human research ethics? A) Beneficence. B) Nonmaleficence. C) Respect for persons. D) Justice. 32. What ethical dilemma is highlighted in the discussion of beneficence and nonmaleficence in the context of human research? A) Balancing the risks and benefits of research to determine when certain benefits should be foregone. B) The need to expose research subjects to risks to ensure certain benefits. C) Fast-tracking medicines during a public health crisis without considering ethical principles. D) Conflicting opinions about the importance of autonomy in research. Test questions continue on next page
59
EliteLearning.com/Psychology
Powered by FlippingBook