A Clinician’s Guide to the DSM-5-TR _ ___________________________________________________________
DIMENSIONAL VS. CATEGORICAL APPROACH There is ongoing debate about whether a dimensional approach to mental health (as proposed by alternative systems like the RDoC) might be more appropriate than the DSM’s categori- cal approach. FINANCIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST Some critics argue that the APA, which publishes the DSM, has a financial conflict of interest that may influence decisions about what to include in the manual. These controversies highlight the ongoing challenges in developing a comprehensive and universally accepted system for diagnosing mental disorders. They also underscore the importance of continued research and debate in mental health.
disorder [intellectual disability], Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, stereotypic movement disorder with self-injury, trichotillomania [hair-pulling disorder], excoriation [skin-picking disorder]).
CRITICISMS AND CONTROVERSIES WITH THE DSM-5-TR The DSM-5-TR has faced several criticisms and controversies [1]. ADDITION OF PROLONGED GRIEF DISORDER The inclusion of prolonged grief disorder has been one of the most controversial changes. Critics argue that it may patholo- gize normal grief reactions, potentially leading to overdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment. Some concerns defining grief as a disorder after just one year (or six months in children) may not account for cultural variations in grieving processes.
ALTERNATIVE DIAGNOSTIC APPROACHES
The criticisms against the DSM-5 and the DSM-5-TR high- light that although the DSM is the most comprehensive and widely utilized diagnostic system currently available, it is not necessarily the only or the best system to classify and diagnose mental disorders. Along these lines, there have been advances in the generation of new diagnostic systems or approaches in recent years. HIERARCHICAL TAXONOMY OF PSYCHOPATHY (HiTOP) The Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) rep- resents a significant departure from the traditional categorical approach of the DSM-5-TR. While the DSM-5-TR relies on discrete diagnostic categories mainly determined by expert consensus, HiTOP adopts a dimensional, data-driven approach to classifying mental health problems [27]. HiTOP organizes psychopathology into a hierarchical structure, ranging from broad, general dimensions to more specific symptoms, based on empirical evidence from large-scale studies. This dimen- sional approach addresses several DSM limitations, includ- ing arbitrary boundaries between normality and pathology, high comorbidity rates, within-disorder heterogeneity, and diagnostic instability. One of the critical differences between HiTOP and the DSM- 5-TR is how they conceptualize mental health problems. The DSM-5-TR views disorders as distinct categories with clear boundaries, while HiTOP sees them as existing on continua of severity. For example, where the DSM-5-TR might diagnose social anxiety disorder as a discrete condition, HiTOP would place an individual on a spectrum of social anxiety, ranging from mild discomfort to severe impairment. This dimensional approach allows for more nuanced assessment and potentially more tailored treatment planning. Additionally, HiTOP’s hierarchical structure explicitly accounts for comorbidity by
MEDICALIZATION OF NORMAL HUMAN EXPERIENCES
Some mental health professionals worry that the DSM-5-TR continues the trend of medicalizing typical human experiences. This concern extends beyond just grief to other areas of human distress that may be inappropriately labeled as disorders.
POTENTIAL FOR OVERDIAGNOSIS AND OVERTREATMENT
With the addition of new disorders and modifications to exist- ing criteria, there are concerns about potential overdiagnosis and subsequent overtreatment, particularly with psychiatric medications. CULTURAL SENSITIVITY AND BIAS Despite efforts to improve cultural sensitivity, some critics argue that the DSM-5-TR still does not adequately account for cultural variations in the expression of mental distress. VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF DIAGNOSES There are ongoing debates about the validity and reliability of specific diagnoses, with some arguing that the categorical approach to mental disorders does not accurately reflect the complexity and dimensionality of mental health. INFLUENCE OF PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY Some critics raise concerns about the potential influence of the pharmaceutical industry on diagnostic criteria, suggesting that new or broadened diagnoses might benefit drug companies. LACK OF BIOMARKERS Like its predecessors, the DSM-5-TR relies primarily on observable symptoms rather than biological markers. Given advancements in neuroscience and genetics, some argue that this approach is outdated.
36
EliteLearning.com/Social-Work
Powered by FlippingBook