3. Create a common set of safety metrics that reflect meaningful outcomes. 4. Increase funding for research in patient safety and implementation science. 5. Address safety across the entire care continuum. 6. Support the healthcare workforce. 7. Partner with patients and families for the safest care. 8. Ensure that technology is safe and optimized to improve patient safety. ● 56% were concerned about complications from a medical procedure. Not all errors lead to injury or death, but the number of preventable injuries that do occur are estimated at least at 1.5 million each year. Hospitals becoming accountable While adverse events result in substantial costs, hospitals bear only a small proportion of these costs and therefore have few financial incentives to invest in patient safety interventions. On average, hospitals externalized 78% of the costs of all injuries and 70% of the costs of negligent injuries. Patient safety advocates are seeking to make a business case to demonstrate that if health care organizations invest in safer practices and systems, they will reap financial returns in the form of reduced malpractice costs and other expenses (Tanne, 2008).
re-designed to avoid heaping more, potentially disjointed, initiatives onto an already stressed delivery system and caregivers. Meaningful advancement in patient safety can occur only when a total systems approach underpins improvement initiatives. The NPSF identified the following eight targeted recommendations for developing a total systems approach to safety: 1. Ensure that leaders establish and sustain a safety culture. 2. Create centralized and coordinated oversight of patient safety. Patient safety concerns While the National Patient Safety Foundation (NPSF) has done a significant amount of work to address the problem of medical errors and patient safety, organizations must commitment to creating and nourishing a culture of safety. Public fear of medical errors Americans have had a very real fear of medical errors, with 42% reporting that they have been affected by a medical error, either personally or through a friend or relative (Blendon et al., 2002). Overall, individuals polled by the American Society of Health System Pharmacists (1999) expressed high concern regarding various aspects of medical errors. The percentages are listed as follows: ● 61% were concerned about being given the wrong medicine. ● 58% were concerned about being given two or more medicines that interact in a negative way.
TYPES OF MEDICAL ERRORS
Medical errors represent a serious public health problem and pose a threat to patient safety. All patients are Misdiagnosis of symptoms Misdiagnosis includes a failure to diagnose an underlying condition. This could ultimately lead to medical malpractice if the undiagnosed disease causes damage, disability, or even death. Incorrect diagnoses have the potential of administering incorrect, ineffective treatment or unnecessary testing. Incorrect diagnosis may be costly and invasive but for the patient it will have far greater consequences (Rodziewicz et al., 2023). Errors in medication Medication errors alone account for at least 1.5 million preventable adverse drug events annually in the United States. Errors in medication are propelled by numerous human interaction points. Four stages of medication process The pathway connecting a clinician's decision to prescribe a medication and the patient actually receiving the medication consists of several steps (AHRQ, n.d): ● Ordering : The clinician must select the appropriate medication and the dose, frequency, and duration. ● Transcribing : In a paper-based system, an intermediary (a clerk in the hospital setting, or a pharmacist or pharmacy technician in the outpatient setting) must read and interpret the prescription correctly. ● Dispensing : The pharmacist must check for drug–drug interactions and allergies, then release the appropriate quantity of the medication in the correct form. ● Administration : The correct medication must be supplied to the correct patient at the correct time. In hospitals or long-term care settings, this is generally the responsibility of nurses or other trained staff; in ambulatory care the responsibility falls to patients or caregivers.
potentially vulnerable, therefore medical errors are costly from a human, economic, and social viewpoint.
Under-diagnosis Under-diagnosis is common for conditions with either no symptoms or vague, mild symptoms. The medical professional may also have a lack of proper understanding about a particular condition which leads to under-diagnosis. Under-diagnosis may occur for conditions that are rare or simply do not get much consideration by patients or doctors. (Hall et al., 2020). Each of these four stages is subject to human interaction points, allowing for multiple opportunities for error. The three methods used in ferreting out errors in the medication process are (Lisby et al., 2005): 1. Direct observations. 2. Unannounced control visits. 3. Chart reviews. The vulnerability of human interaction points in the process remains present. The differences are as follows. Direct observation puts four eyes on the event rather than just two. Unannounced controlled visits permit someone coming in front of, during, or following a treatment or administration of medication. That quantifies what will occur, what is occurring, or what has occurred. Bringing those three elements together will hedge results or more likely pinpoint medical errors at a later date. Chart reviews will be a motivating factor for the medical professionals to more accurately report and document. Small slips will be identified before a catastrophic event occurs.
Page 104
Book Code: MFL1227
EliteLearning.com/Massage-Therapy
Powered by FlippingBook