of the patient’s healthcare and medication usage patterns can be used to assess pain behaviors, where diaries can be completed to track the frequency and quantity of Pain interference on life quality The impact of chronic pain on function can be subdivided into patients’ physical capacities, the ability of patients to perform activities of daily living, and their ability to function in adult roles such as employment. Focus groups of people with persistent pain indicate that their overall physical functioning was degraded because of their pain, supporting the recommendation that assessment of functioning should be an integral part of pain assessment. The ability (or inability) to perform necessary and desired functions, in turn, can significantly impact the quality of life. Poor reliability and questionable validity of physical examination measures have led to the development of self-report functional status measures to quantify symptoms, function, and behavior directly, and the severity of pain when performing specific activities (e.g., ability to walk upstairs or lift specific weights, sitting for specific periods) associated with distinct types of painful conditions (e.g., osteoarthritis, low back pain). Research has demonstrated the importance of assessing overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in chronic A measure of emotional coping and distress There are multiple clinical reviews explaining how chronic pain assessment is directly affected by the measure of emotional distress, particularly depression, anger, loss, irritability, and anxiety. The presence of emotional distress in people with chronic pain presents a challenge when assessing symptoms such as fatigue, reduced activity level, decreased libido, appetite change, sleep disturbance, weight gain or loss, and memory and concentration deficits, as these symptoms can be the result of pain, emotional distress, or treatment medications prescribed to control pain. Instruments have been developed specifically for pain patients to assess psychological distress, the impact of emotional, and behavioral dimensions. When deciding on a pain-assessment tool, the investigator must determine which aspect of pain they wish to evaluate while keeping in mind the characteristics of the group of patients, their backgrounds, and their communication skills. Making the proper choice will facilitate the acquisition of meaningful data and the formulation of valid conclusions. Tools for pain assessment in children The most widely regarded modality for the assessment of pain in children was developed by a EuroPain study group. Evaluation of pain in children is always delicate and notoriously difficult because it depends on the level of cognitive development and psychological condition of the child. The reactions to prolonged pain, as seen in palliative care, may be characterized by withdrawal and are similar to depression in their manifestations. Pain measurement tools used in children must determine the presence and severity of pain in various conditions. Most pain scales used in adults can also be used in children, provided they can be understood. Pain should be assessed from a multidimensional perspective by combining subjective and objective measurement tools, including self-report, behavioral measures, and physiologic indicators. Physiologic measures alone cannot be interpreted simply as pain, as they are also signs of stress. In children under the age of 5 and those with developmental deficits, self-assessment is limited. In older children, the correlation between self- assessment and behavioral methods is variable. False replies
medications, and antecedent and consequent events of medication use (e.g., stress and activity) that may be associated with factors other than pain.
pain patients in addition to function. There are many well- established, psychometrically supported HRQOL measures [Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF- 36)], general measures of physical functioning [e.g., Pain Disability Index (PDI)], and disease-specific measures [e.g., Western Ontario MacMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC); Roland-Morris Back Pain Disability Questionnaire (RDQ)] to assess function and quality of life. Disease-specific measures are designed to evaluate the impact of a specific condition (e.g., pain and stiffness in people with osteoarthritis), whereas generic measures make it possible to compare physical functioning associated with a given disorder and its treatment with that of various other conditions (Wilson et al., 2022). Specific effects of a disorder may not be detected when using a generic measure; therefore, disease-specific measures may be more likely to reveal clinically important improvement or deterioration in specific functions as a result of treatment. General measures of functioning may be useful to compare patients with a diversity of painful conditions. pain on patients’ lives, feeling of control, coping behaviors, and attitudes about the disease, pain, and healthcare providers (Perugino et al., 2022). For example, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Profile of Mood States (POMS) are psychometrically sound for assessing symptoms of depressed mood, emotional distress, and mood disturbance, and have been recommended to be used in all clinical trials of chronic pain; however, the scores must be interpreted with caution, and the criteria for levels of emotional distress may need to be modified to prevent false positives. and underrating are possible. As a result, a multidimensional approach is, in general, warranted. Unidimensional pain measurement tools in children The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) is generally the “gold standard” for children, as it is for adults. The scale has been adapted for children and is usually presented vertically. Particularly in the setting of palliative care, the reliability of self-assessment will depend on the care with which it is applied to obtain measurements. NRS is used in children, but they have to be old enough to count up to 10, which means they have to be school-aged children. Other tools are more useful for preschool children. A VAS score can be obtained from a 3-year-old child, but the reply can be misleading, as at that age the child does not have the same abstract capacities as older children. They tend to choose the extremities of the scale, whether for the VAS or another tool (such as the “algocube”). The Bieri Face Scale can be recommended as it is sensitive to pain intensity and less to emotions in comparison with the Smiley Analogue Scale. Indeed, recently it has been shown that scales with smiles or tears show higher rating scores than scales with “neutral” faces (as the Bieri scale). The number of faces is also important. Although some scales show up to nine faces, the best choice may be a scale using from five to six faces, because of the child’s cognitive capacities. The Bieri scale has a shorter version (Carl Von Baeyer, personal communication). The Poker Chip Tool representing four pieces of hurt has been used in acute pain.
Tools designed for pain assessment and measurement—Methods of pain assessment Pain is a sensation with physiological, psychological,
Page 145
Book Code: PYCA2725
EliteLearning.com/Psychology
Powered by FlippingBook